I wanted to share an analysis of a very interesting work where they develop concepts related to software architecture solutions. We know that the architecture of a software solution is very important to the success of a development. In my experience as a software architect in previous works dedicated to the software industry, very often expressed an effect of "do not have time to complete thearchitectural review. " What is the justification? if we can justify it. It is very expensive,time consuming, depending on the architectural documentation of the solution, a scenario that could never discuss "is a small project with a limited life cycle, with minimum documentation" So what options do we have when the project has these characteristics, and we'resure that we execute architectural reviews? “However, in spite of the demonstrated benefits of architecture reviews, many projects are unable or unwilling to use them. These projects tend to have the following cha
Comments
Post a Comment